<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enterprise 2.0: Strategic or Ad-Hoc?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://changingway.org/2008/06/16/enterprise-20-strategic-or-ad-hoc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://changingway.org/2008/06/16/enterprise-20-strategic-or-ad-hoc/</link>
	<description>Andrew weighs in on the ways in which the web and the world are changing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 02:44:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enterprise 2.0: Some Thoughts on Vendors &#171; Changing Way</title>
		<link>http://changingway.org/2008/06/16/enterprise-20-strategic-or-ad-hoc/#comment-5553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0: Some Thoughts on Vendors &#171; Changing Way]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://changingway.wordpress.com/?p=1000#comment-5553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 16, 2008   This post follows from the previous, which discussed strategic and ad-hoc adoption of E2. It will map vendors on to that discussion, in a couple of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 16, 2008   This post follows from the previous, which discussed strategic and ad-hoc adoption of E2. It will map vendors on to that discussion, in a couple of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

